LET Results September 2026 Board Exam

The Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) in the Philippines is an essential step for those aiming to become licensed educators. Managed by the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC), this rigorous exam evaluates candidates on the core knowledge and skills required for teaching in both elementary and secondary schools.

Here's a guide on the essentials for those preparing for or awaiting the LET Board Exam results, with a special look into upcoming and recent exams, including tips on interpreting the LET Results for the September 2026 Board Exam.

Key Components of the LET
1. Exam Structure
   The LET is divided into two main categories:
   - **General Education and Professional Education**: For aspiring elementary school teachers.
   - **General Education, Professional Education, and a Major Subject**: For secondary school teachers, depending on their area of specialization (e.g., Math, English, Science).
2. Exam Coverage
   - **General Education**: Includes language, science, math, and social sciences.
   - **Professional Education**: Covers topics like teaching methodologies, educational psychology, and curriculum development.
   - **Specialization (Secondary Level)**: Tests subject-specific knowledge for secondary school teachers.
3. Scoring and Passing Rate   The PRC usually sets a **passing rate of 75%**, calculated based on the combined scores in all test areas. Candidates must score sufficiently in each section to meet this threshold.

How to Check LET Results
The PRC publishes results for the LET on its official website and through major Philippine news outlets. Results are typically released **a few weeks to months after the examination**. Here’s how to check:
1. Visit the PRC Official Website 
   Go to the PRC website and find the licensure exam results page. Select the relevant exam date, such as "September 2026 LET Results."
2. Search by Name or PRC Number 
   Candidates can enter their full name or PRC registration number to locate their result.
3. Regional Results and Topnotchers  
   The PRC also publishes a list of the top-performing examinees and schools, which can help aspiring teachers identify strong training programs.

Preparing for the LET
For those still preparing for future exams, here are some essential study tips:
1. **Understand the Exam Scope**: Review the official syllabus and outline provided by the PRC.
2. **Study and Practice**: Use LET review centers, online resources, and mock exams to gauge your preparedness.
3. **Time Management**: Practice pacing yourself during study sessions to ensure coverage of all topics.

Interpreting the September 2026 LET Results
Once the results are out, successful examinees can proceed with **PRC license registration**. The PRC typically sets schedules for **initial registration** for newly licensed teachers, which includes paying registration fees and taking the professional oath.
If you need more specific details about the LET or guidance on exam preparation, feel free to ask!
LET Board Exam  Results   
The Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) is a crucial milestone for aspiring educators in the Philippines. This comprehensive examination, administered by the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC), assesses the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary for effective teaching. This article delves into the intricacies of LET, exploring its history, legal framework, and the various components that comprise this pivotal examination.
The Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) stands as a significant milestone for individuals aspiring to become educators in the Philippines. Administered by the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC), this rigorous examination serves as a benchmark to evaluate the knowledge, skills, and competencies essential for effective teaching practices.

A Historical Perspective:
The roots of the LET can be traced back to the early 20th century, a time when the Philippine government acknowledged the necessity for a standardized assessment of teacher qualifications. In 1923, the inaugural LET took place with the primary objective of ensuring that educators possessed the foundational knowledge and skills needed to deliver quality education to students. Since its inception, the LET has evolved through various revisions and updates to align with the changing landscape of pedagogy and educational standards.

Understanding the LET Framework:
The LET is designed to comprehensively evaluate the proficiency of aspiring teachers across various subject areas and teaching competencies. The examination covers a wide range of topics, including but not limited to educational foundations, curriculum development, assessment and evaluation, teaching strategies, and classroom management. By assessing these core areas, the LET aims to certify individuals who demonstrate the aptitude and readiness to excel in the field of education.

*Preparation and Performance:
Preparing for the LET requires dedication, perseverance, and a thorough understanding of the examination's format and content. Aspirants are encouraged to engage in extensive review sessions, practice tests, and collaborative study groups to enhance their readiness for the challenging assessment. Additionally, maintaining a positive mindset, managing stress effectively, and staying focused on the goal of obtaining a teaching license are crucial aspects of LET preparation.
The Impact of LET Results:
The release of LET results is a pivotal moment for aspiring educators, as it signifies the culmination of their efforts and dedication throughout the examination process. Successfully passing the LET opens doors to a myriad of opportunities in the field of education, allowing individuals to pursue their passion for teaching and make a positive impact on the lives of students.
The Licensure Examination for Teachers is not merely a test of knowledge and skills but a testament to the commitment and passion of individuals dedicated to the noble profession of teaching. Aspiring educators who undertake the LET journey embark on a path of continuous learning, growth, and transformation, shaping the future of education in the Philippines.
The Full List of Passers LET September 2024
RESULTS: LET September 2024 Board Exam for professional teachers
LET RESULTS September 2024
RESULT: LET September 2024 Board Exam - Elementary Level
RESULT: LET September 2024 Board Exam - Secondary Level
22 March
SUMMARY OF LET RESULTS MARCH 2022
2021 September 


Historical Context and Evolution of LET
The LET's roots can be traced back to the early 20th century, when the Philippine government recognized the need for standardized assessment of teacher qualifications. The first LET was conducted in 1923, aiming to ensure that teachers possessed the fundamental knowledge and skills required to impart education effectively. Over the years, the examination has undergone several revisions and updates to reflect evolving pedagogical practices and educational standards.
 
The current iteration of LET, as we know it today, is governed by Republic Act No. 7836, also known as the "Philippine Teachers Professionalization Act of 1994." This landmark legislation established the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) as the primary body responsible for administering the LET and regulating the teaching profession in the Philippines.
 
Legal Framework and Governing Bodies
 
The LET is firmly grounded in Philippine law, with several key pieces of legislation shaping its structure and administration:
 
- Republic Act No. 7836 (Philippine Teachers Professionalization Act of 1994): This act defines the qualifications, responsibilities, and ethical standards for teachers in the Philippines. It also mandates the LET as a prerequisite for obtaining a professional teacher's license.
- Professional Regulation Commission (PRC): The PRC is the government agency tasked with administering the LET, issuing professional teacher's licenses, and overseeing the ethical conduct of teachers.
- Board for Professional Teachers (BPT): The BPT is a specialized body under the PRC responsible for setting the LET syllabus, developing examination questions, and evaluating the performance of examinees.
 
Components of the LET
 
The LET is a comprehensive examination encompassing two main categories:
 
- General Education (GenEd): This section assesses the examinee's knowledge and understanding of fundamental subjects across disciplines, including:
- Communication Skills: Reading comprehension, writing, and oral communication.
- Mathematics: Basic arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and statistics.
- Science: Biology, chemistry, physics, and earth science.
- Social Science: Philippine history, government, economics, and geography.
- Arts and Culture: Music, art, literature, and performing arts.
- Technology and Livelihood Education: Basic computer skills, entrepreneurship, and practical skills.
- Values Education: Ethics, moral reasoning, and civic responsibility.
- Professional Education (ProfEd): This section focuses on the examinee's understanding of teaching theory, pedagogy, and educational practices, including:
- Principles and Theories of Teaching and Learning: Educational psychology, learning theories, instructional design, and classroom management.
- Curriculum Development: Curriculum planning, assessment, and evaluation.
- Educational Technology: Integration of technology in teaching and learning.
- Assessment and Evaluation: Types of assessment, grading systems, and assessment tools.
- Guidance and Counseling: Understanding student needs, providing guidance, and promoting student welfare.
- Research in Education: Research methodology, data analysis, and educational research applications.
- Special Education: Understanding the needs of diverse learners and providing inclusive education.
- Ethics and Professionalism: Code of ethics for teachers, professional development, and ethical practices in the teaching profession.
 
Importance of Passing the LET
 
Passing the LET is not just a requirement for entering the teaching profession; it signifies a commitment to professional standards and a dedication to providing quality education. A professional teacher's license grants the holder the right to teach in public and private schools in the Philippines, opening doors to a fulfilling career dedicated to shaping young minds.
 
The LET is a challenging but rewarding examination that serves as a gateway to a fulfilling career in education. Understanding the history, legal framework, and components of the LET is essential for aspiring teachers to prepare effectively and achieve success in this crucial milestone. By mastering the knowledge and skills assessed in the LET, future educators can contribute to the advancement of education and the development of future generations in the Philippines.
The LET Board Exam Results are out, and if you're one of the aspiring teachers who took the exam, you're probably eager to know the results! The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) releases the results, which include the list of passers, topnotchers, and performance of schools ¹ ².
Now, let's talk about the laws covered in the LET exam. The exam covers various topics, including:
- *General Education*: English, Filipino, Mathematics, Science, and Social Sciences ¹
- *Professional Education*: Teaching Profession, Social Dimensions of Education, Principles of Teaching, Educational Technology, and Curriculum Development ¹
- *Specialized Subjects*: Depending on the specialization, such as English, Filipino, Biological Sciences, Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Social Studies, and Values Education ¹
The LET exam is crucial because it ensures that teachers have the necessary knowledge, skills, and competencies to provide quality education to students. Passing the LET exam is a requirement for teachers to practice their profession in the Philippines.

Here are some key points about the LET exam:
- *Registration and Oath-taking*: Successful examinees need to register and take their oath to become licensed professional teachers (LPTs) ²
- *Importance*: The LET exam ensures that teachers meet the standards set by the PRC and the Department of Education (DepEd) ¹
- *Career Opportunities*: Passing the LET exam opens up career opportunities for teachers in public and private schools, as well as in other educational institutions ¹



Expanded Eligibility for the Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET): Opening Doors to Diverse Career Paths
The Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) in the Philippines has undergone a significant expansion, broadening the range of courses eligible for taking the exam and clarifying the mandatory units required for Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) licensure. This move aims to address the growing demand for qualified teachers across various disciplines and to streamline the process for aspiring educators.

Eligibility Expansion: Previously, only specific education-related courses were eligible for the LET. This limited the pool of potential teachers and often resulted in a shortage of qualified professionals in specialized fields like science, mathematics, and technical-vocational education. The new regulations significantly expand the list of eligible courses, encompassing a wider array of disciplines. This includes, but is not limited to, courses with a strong foundation in pedagogy and subject matter expertise. The PRC has released a comprehensive list of eligible courses, categorized by specialization, available on their official website.

Clarification of Mandatory Units: A key element of the revised guidelines is the clarification of mandatory units required for PRC licensure. These units, which are crucial for demonstrating pedagogical competency, now have clearly defined standards and learning outcomes. The mandatory units typically cover areas such as educational psychology, curriculum development, teaching methodologies, assessment strategies, and classroom management. The specific number of units and their content may vary slightly depending on the chosen specialization and the accrediting institution. However, the PRC has established a minimum standard to ensure a consistent level of quality across all programs.

Impact on Aspiring Teachers: The expanded eligibility criteria and clarified mandatory units offer several benefits for aspiring teachers. Firstly, it opens up opportunities for individuals from diverse academic backgrounds to pursue a teaching career. This is particularly important for attracting qualified professionals in high-demand fields where teacher shortages are prevalent. Secondly, the clear guidelines simplify the process of determining eligibility, reducing confusion and uncertainty for students and institutions alike. This ensures that prospective teachers can focus on their studies and preparation for the LET with greater clarity and confidence.

Addressing Teacher Shortages: This reform is a direct response to the persistent challenge of teacher shortages in the Philippines. By expanding the pool of eligible candidates, the government aims to attract and retain more qualified teachers, ultimately improving the quality of education across the country. The revised guidelines also encourage institutions to develop and strengthen their teacher education programs, aligning them with the updated requirements and promoting best practices in teacher training.

Continuous Improvement: The PRC emphasizes that these changes are not static. The guidelines will be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the evolving needs of the education sector and the advancements in pedagogical practices. This commitment to continuous improvement ensures that the LET remains relevant and effective in producing highly qualified and competent teachers for the nation.
Further Information: For detailed information on the updated eligibility requirements, mandatory units, and the LET application process, aspiring teachers are encouraged to visit the official website of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC). 

The website provides comprehensive resources, including frequently asked questions, downloadable forms, and contact information for further assistance.
Conclusion: The expansion of eligibility for the LET and the clarification of mandatory units represent a significant step forward in strengthening the teaching profession in the Philippines. This reform not only addresses existing teacher shortages but also paves the way for a more diverse and highly qualified teaching workforce, ultimately contributing to the improvement of education quality for all Filipinos. The ongoing commitment to review and update the guidelines ensures that the LET remains a dynamic and effective instrument in shaping the future of education in the country.








--------
 Heidi Mendoza Leverages Auditing Expertise in Senate Bid

Former Commission on Audit (COA) Chairperson Heidi Mendoza, a prominent senatorial candidate in the upcoming elections, confidently presented her extensive auditing experience as a key qualification for a Senate seat during her appearance on ABS-CBN’s Harapan 2025 on Tuesday. Mendoza's campaign hinges on her assertion that her years spent scrutinizing government finances and operations have uniquely prepared her for the complexities and responsibilities of a Senatorial role.

While acknowledging the inherent differences between the roles of a senator and a state auditor, Mendoza emphasized the transferable skills and insights she gained during her tenure at COA. She highlighted the multifaceted nature of her auditing work, extending beyond mere financial calculations to encompass a broader focus on operational efficiency and improvement. "Our audits aren't just about costs or numbers," Mendoza explained, "we audit to improve operations. Our value-for-money audit reports contain numerous policy recommendations that I can directly apply in the Senate."

This statement underscores Mendoza's campaign strategy, which centers on leveraging her expertise in fiscal oversight to address pressing national issues. Her experience in identifying inefficiencies, uncovering irregularities, and formulating policy recommendations positions her as a candidate capable of bringing a unique perspective to the Senate. She intends to utilize her deep understanding of government processes to advocate for greater transparency, accountability, and efficient resource allocation.

Mendoza's appearance on Harapan 2025 provided a platform to elaborate on her vision for the country and how her background informs her approach to policy-making. She likely discussed specific instances where her auditing experience uncovered critical issues within government agencies, illustrating the potential impact of her expertise in the Senate. Her focus on "value-for-money" audits suggests a commitment to ensuring that public funds are used responsibly and effectively, a message that resonates with voters concerned about government spending and corruption.

The implications of Mendoza's candidacy are significant. Her background as a COA Chairperson brings a level of credibility and expertise often lacking in political discourse. Her presence in the Senate could potentially lead to more informed and evidence-based policy discussions, particularly concerning budget allocation and government accountability. The success of her campaign will depend on her ability to effectively communicate the relevance of her auditing experience to the broader concerns of the electorate. Voters will need to assess whether her expertise translates into effective legislative action and whether her policy recommendations align with their own priorities.

The upcoming elections present a critical juncture for the Philippines. The choice of senators will significantly impact the country's trajectory in the coming years. Mendoza's candidacy adds a new dimension to the political landscape, offering voters a candidate with a unique background and a distinct policy focus. The success of her campaign will be closely watched, not only for its impact on the Senate but also for its potential to influence the broader conversation surrounding government transparency and accountability. Her appearance on Harapan 2025 serves as a crucial moment in her campaign, setting the stage for a more detailed examination of her policy positions and her vision for the future of the Philippines. The coming weeks will be critical in determining whether Mendoza's promise of effective, evidence-based governance resonates with the Filipino people. Her campaign will need to successfully bridge the gap between her specialized expertise and the broader concerns of the general population to secure a Senate seat. The outcome will undoubtedly shape the future composition and direction of the Philippine Senate.

Former Commission on Audit (COA) Chairperson Heidi Mendoza, a seasoned whistleblower known for exposing irregularities within the military and local government units, is making a strong bid for a Senate seat. Her campaign platform centers on fiscal responsibility, transparency, and accountability, drawing heavily on her extensive experience in government oversight. In recent statements, Mendoza highlighted four key aspects of her qualifications, emphasizing her preparedness for the rigors of senatorial life.

Mendoza's first point underscores her familiarity with oversight functions: "Secondly, in the exercise of oversight, we're used to that because the commission, of course, plays an oversight role." This statement directly links her experience at COA to the Senate's crucial oversight responsibilities, suggesting a seamless transition of skills. Her years spent auditing government agencies have equipped her with the knowledge and expertise to effectively scrutinize government spending and performance.
Her second point emphasizes a commitment to representing ordinary citizens: "Thirdly, and this is what I think is unique about the Senate, is that there are ordinary people there – not wealthy, not politicians – but working people who are not corrupt and are honest." This statement positions Mendoza as a champion of the common Filipino, contrasting her background with the often-perceived elitism within political circles. She aims to represent the interests of ordinary citizens, advocating for policies that benefit the majority rather than a privileged few.

Mendoza's third point highlights her experience in investigations: "Fourthly, of course, if there are investigations, what we call the Blue Ribbon Committee, we're used to that. Because the rules of investigation are very similar to what we call the standards and procedures of audit." This statement directly addresses the Senate's investigative powers, drawing a parallel between the investigative processes of the Senate and the auditing procedures she's mastered at COA. Her familiarity with investigative methodologies suggests a preparedness to effectively participate in Senate inquiries and contribute meaningfully to uncovering corruption and holding officials accountable.
Mendoza's past as a whistleblower is integral to her campaign narrative. She has bravely faced threats and risks to expose corruption, demonstrating a steadfast commitment to her principles. Her statement, "I reached a point where my child and family were in danger, but I stood my ground and delivered. What greater challenge could I face?" powerfully encapsulates her unwavering dedication to transparency and accountability. This personal experience underscores her willingness to confront powerful interests in pursuit of justice and good governance.

Her campaign promises include rigorous budget scrutiny and a relentless pursuit of transparency and accountability. She vows to remain steadfast in her commitments, even after winning a Senate seat. This commitment to her principles is a central theme of her campaign, resonating with voters who are disillusioned with political corruption and seeking genuine leadership.

Mendoza's candidacy presents a compelling alternative to traditional politicians. Her unique background, combined with her unwavering commitment to transparency and accountability, offers a fresh perspective on governance. Her ability to translate her auditing expertise into effective legislative action will be a key factor in determining the success of her campaign. The upcoming election will be a critical test of whether voters prioritize her specialized skills and unwavering commitment to fighting corruption over more traditional political affiliations. The success of her campaign will have significant implications for the future direction of Philippine politics, potentially influencing the balance of power in the Senate and shaping the national conversation on government transparency and accountability. Her candidacy represents a significant moment in Philippine politics, offering a potential shift towards a more transparent and accountable government.

-------

Criminal Charges Imminent Against House Leaders Over Allegedly Anomalous Bicam Report

A media forum spearheaded by Davao 1st District Representative Pantaleon Alvarez on Saturday, February 8, 2025, announced the impending filing of criminal charges against House Speaker Martin Romualdez, Ako Bicol Representative Elizalde Co, and Zamboanga Representative Mannix Dalipe. The charges stem from alleged anomalies surrounding the Bicameral Conference Committee Report related to the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA).

The forum, which garnered significant media attention, featured a panel of prominent figures including senatorial aspirant Atty. Jimmy Bondoc, Atty. Ferdinand Topacio, and Mr. Diego Magpantay, president of the Citizens Crime Watch (CCW). The gravity of the allegations and the high-profile individuals involved have ignited a firestorm of controversy, raising serious concerns about transparency and accountability within the Philippine legislative process.

Representative Alvarez, a seasoned politician known for his outspokenness and commitment to good governance, served as the key figure in the forum. He provided detailed information supporting the allegations of irregularities within the Bicameral Conference Committee Report, which is the final version of the GAA that reconciles the House and Senate versions of the budget. The specific nature of the alleged anomalies remains unclear pending the formal filing of charges, however, the seriousness of the accusations suggests a significant breach of public trust.

Atty. Bondoc, a senatorial aspirant, added his weight to the allegations, using the forum to highlight the importance of transparency in government spending. His participation lends further credibility to the accusations and underscores the widespread concern over the alleged anomalies. His presence also suggests a potential link between the controversy and the upcoming senatorial elections, raising questions about the political implications of the case.

Atty. Topacio, a known legal expert, provided legal analysis supporting the basis for the criminal charges. His expertise lends weight to the accusations and suggests a strong legal foundation for the case. His involvement indicates a well-planned and strategically executed move to pursue legal action against the accused officials.

Mr. Magpantay, president of the Citizens Crime Watch (CCW), emphasized the organization's commitment to fighting corruption and promoting good governance. The CCW's involvement underscores the growing public concern over the alleged anomalies and highlights the role of civil society organizations in holding government officials accountable. Their participation suggests a broader movement to demand transparency and accountability in government operations.
The accusations leveled against Speaker Romualdez, Representative Co, and Representative Dalipe are exceptionally serious, carrying significant political and legal ramifications. The alleged anomalies within the Bicameral Conference Committee Report, if proven, would represent a serious breach of public trust and a significant undermining of the legislative process. The upcoming legal proceedings will be closely watched by the public, as they could set a precedent for future accountability measures within the Philippine government.

The timing of the media forum, just weeks before the formal filing of charges, suggests a deliberate strategy to maximize public awareness and pressure on the accused officials. The involvement of prominent figures from both legal and political spheres underscores the gravity of the situation and the widespread concern over the alleged anomalies. The case will likely be a protracted legal battle, with far-reaching consequences for those involved and for the Philippine political landscape as a whole. The outcome could significantly impact public trust in government institutions and potentially influence future legislative processes. The ongoing investigation and subsequent legal proceedings promise to be a defining moment in the fight for transparency and accountability within the Philippine government.



Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post